The statistical analysis of subjective assessment of income obtained by farmers. households

Article Sidebar


PDF (Język Polski)

Published:
Dec 17, 2009
Issue
Vol. 96 No. 4 (2009)
Section
Articles
CitedBy/Share
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Main Article Content

Hanna Dudek
Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie, Katedra Ekonometrii i Informatyki
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-2745

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/RNR.2009.96.4.66
Keywords : income, farmers. households, equivalence scales, ordered logit and probit models
Abstract
This paper analyses subjective economic welfare in farmers. households. The study is based on the Household Budget Survey carried out by the Central Statistical Office. Subjective measures are estimated using households. answers to questions about the own satisfaction with their financial situation. In the paper we apply methods of estimation of the subjective equivalence scale elasticity by using ordered logit and probit models. Moreover we analyse socio-demographic determinants of subjective poverty.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dudek, H. (2009). The statistical analysis of subjective assessment of income obtained by farmers. households. Annals of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 96(4), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.22630/RNR.2009.96.4.66
References

Agresti A. 2001: An introduction to categorical data analysis. Wiley&Sons Inc., New York. (Crossref)

Borooah V. K. 2001: Logit and probit: ordered and multinomial models. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, Thousand Oaks.

Budżety gospodarstw domowych w 2006. 2007: GUS, Warszawa.

Buhmann B., Rainwater L., Schmaus G., Smeeding T.M. 1988: Equivalence scales well-Being, inequality, and poverty: sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database. Review of Income and Wealth, nr 34, str. 115-142. (Crossref)

Dudek H. 2007: An identification of farmers' households in danger of poverty on the ground ofordered logit model. [W:] K. Jajuga i M. Walesiak (red.). Taksonomia 14. Wyd. Akademii Ekonomicznej we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, str. 367-175.

Gruszczyński M. 2002: Modele i prognozy zmiennych jakościowych w finansach i bankowości. Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa.

Johnson D. S., Smeeding T. M., and Torres B. B. 2005: Economic inequality through the prisms of income and consumption. Monthly Labor Review, vol. 128, nr. 4, s. 11-24.

Kot S.M. 2000: Ekonometryczne modele dobrobytu. PWN, Warszawa-Kraków.

Kot S. M. 2002: Metodologiczne dylematy pomiaru nierówności dobrobytu. [W:] Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy. Rzeszów.

Long J. S., Freese J. 2001: Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata Press Publication, College Station, Texas.

Metodyka badania budżetów gospodarstw domowych. 1999: GUS, Warszawa.

Panek T. 1991: Demographic and socio-economic determinants of poverty: case study of Poland. [W:] Poverty measurement for economies in transition in eastern European countries. Polish Statistical Association, Warsaw,.

Schwarze J. 2003: Using panel data on income satisfaction to estimate equivalence scale elasticity. Review of Income and Wealth, nr 49, str. 359-372. (Crossref)

Szulc A. 2007: Dochód i konsumpcja. [W:] Statystyka społeczna, red. T. Panek. PWE, Warszawa.lw

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Recommend Articles