Property rights of goods and their implications for agricultural land transfer

Main Article Content

Alina Sikorska
Adam Wasilewski


Keywords : agricultural land, property rights, market land transfer, non-market land transfer
Abstract
The aim of the research was to determine the relationship between market and non-market transfer of property rights of agricultural land. This analysis was carried out due to the second proposition of the theory of well-being, from which it follows that every effective allocation in the Pareto sense can be achieved as a result of the decentralized market mechanism. In addition, an attempt was made to answer the question: if, and if so, how, the existing system of property rights limits the scale of the market allocation of land resources. The research also assessed the state's interference in the process of land allocation. The results of the research are presented in two parts. The first part presents the main assumptions of the theory of property rights, the issue of state interference in the scope of property rights and the resulting consequences for trade in land. In the second part, the market and non-market transfers of physical property were analyzed. Based on the obtained results, it was found that there are possibilities for further development of the market, and there are premises for a gradual improvement in the efficiency of land allocation in Poland.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sikorska, A., & Wasilewski, A. (2018). Property rights of goods and their implications for agricultural land transfer. Annals of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 105(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.22630/RNR.2018.105.2.12
References

Alchian Armen, Demsetz Harold 1973: The Property Right Paradigm, „The Journal of Economic History”, Vol. 33, No. 1, The Tasks of Economic History, ss. 16-27. (Crossref)

Giliczyński Bolesław 1921: Likwidacja serwitutów. Główny Urząd Ziemski, ss. 3-195.

Janicki Stanisław, Rosiński Stefan, Ubysz Feliks (red.) 1918: Stosunki rolnicze Królestwa Kongresowego, Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Dóbr Koronnych, Warszawa, ss. 30-43.

Kot Stanisław 2012: Ku stochastycznemu paradygmatowi ekonomii dobrobytu. Impuls, Kraków, ss. 1-212.

Kuryłowicz Marek, Wiliński Adam 2008: Rzymskie prawo prywatne, Wolters Kluwer, Warszawa, ss. 1-304.

Ławrynowicz Maciej 2004: Spółdzielnia a koncepcje neoinstytucjonalne, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny”, LXVI z. 3, ss.159-179.

Majchrzak Adam 2015: Ziemia rolnicza w krajach Unii Europejskiej w warunkach ewolucji Wspólnej Polityki Rolnej, PWN, Warszawa, ss. 156-162.

Ostrom Elinor, Gardner Roy, Walker James 1994: Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, The University of Michigan Press. ss. 1-330. (Crossref)

Ostrom Elinor, Schlager Edella 1992: Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis, „Land Economics”, no 68 (3), ss. 249-262. (Crossref)

Ostrom Elinor 1990: Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press. ss.1-295. (Crossref)

Rynek ziemi rolniczej stan i perspektywy, Analizy rynkowe, IERiGŻ-PIB, KOWR, MRiRW, 2017.

Sikorska Alina 2013: Przemiany w strukturze agrarnej indywidualnych gospodarstw rolnych, IERiGŻ-PIB, Warszawa, ss. 1-40.

Slangen Louis 2002: New Institutional Economics and Economic Organisational Theory, Wageningen University, ss. 1-89.

Stiglitz Joseph 2004: Ekonomia sektora publicznego, PWN, Warszawa, ss. 65-146.

Ustawa z dnia 14 kwietnia 2016 roku o wstrzymaniu sprzedaży nieruchomości Zasobu Własności Rolnej Skarbu Państwa oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw, Dz.U. 2016 poz. 585. (Crossref)

Ustawa z dnia 16 kwietnia 2004 r. o ochronie przyrody, Dz.U. 2004 nr 92 poz. 880 z poźn. zm., art. 6.

Ustawa z dnia 3 lutego 1995 r. o ochronie gruntów rolnych i leśnych. Dz.U. 1995.16.78 z późn. zm.

Wasilewski Adam, Krukowski Krzysztof 2004: Land Conversion for Suburban Housing: A Study of Urbanization Around Warsaw and Olsztyn, Poland, „Environmental Management” Vol. 34, No. 2. ss. 291-303. (Crossref)

Wicki Ludwik. (2017). Changes in land use for production of energy crops in Poland. Roczniki Naukowe Ekonomii Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich, 104 (4), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.22630/RNR.2017.104.4.31 (Crossref)

Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.